California Proposition 65 was enforced to a tune of $35 million in 2018, $9 million more than in 2017. Companies that sell products into California ar...
Proposition 65: A Global Compliance Manager Responds
The California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (better known as Proposition 65) impacts every company that sells, or may sell, i...
Bounty Hunters Target Products With Dirty Dozen Substances
When bounty hunters eye potentially non-compliant products under the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (better known as...
Six Things You Need to Know About Proposition 65 Over-Labeling
When new labeling requirements for the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65) came into effect in 2018, com...
New York Considers Product Labeling Legislation Similar to Proposition 65
Proposition 65 has introduced broad data collection and product labeling requirements to companies that sell products in or into the state of Californ...
Ask the Experts: February 1 Edition
Our regulatory subject matter experts are always helping a range of stakeholders solve compelling regulatory challenges associated with supply chain d...
Proposition 65: Small Labels Could Cause Big Problems
Amendments could be coming for California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (better known as Proposition 65) short-form labeling provision...
OEHHA Adds Nickel to Proposition 65 List
On October 26, 2018, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) added soluble nickel compounds to the Proposition 65 list after the ...